Powered by questionform.com
survey disabled

WESPA Ratings Questionnaire

Basics*

Name

Email address

Country

Committee position (if any)

Rating criteria

The criteria for a tournament to be eligible for WESPA Ratings can be found at http://members.ozemail.com.au/~rjackman/WRC.html

The current criteria for events to qualify for WESPA Ratings are:

Further comment on rating criteria (if any)

Opinions

Please indicate your agreement or disagreement with the following statements

Strongly agreeAgreeDisagreeStrongly disagree
I would like to see one global rating system eventually replace local/national ratings
One nominated major tournament in each member association's country should be rated every year, regardless of whether they fulfil the current ratings criteria
Any number of major tournaments in each member association's country should be rated every year, regardless of whether they fulfil the current ratings criteria
The WESPA ratings system should investigate using spread as a ratings factor, alongside wins/losses.
An event which provides word lists to competitors for using during games, such as the annual Kings Cup in Bangkok, should not be WESPA-rated
WESPA's current ratings fees are fair and justificable ($1 per player per tournament in a member country, $2 per player per tournament in a non-member country)
The current WESPA ratings are a reliable indicator of ability.

Rating timescale

What timescale is it reasonable to expect, from the data being sent to the Ratings Officer(s) after an event to the appearance of the new rating lists?

Current system

What is your view of your own country's existing rating system?

Additional comment on your country's existing system (if any)

Further comments

Any further comments on any issue regarding WESPA Ratings past, present and future. This is your voice so please use it!

this survey is closed, no further responses allowedsurvey disabled
powered by

Create Online Surveys and Forms

questionform.com